Prepared For Anything

I’ve started working on an article about glass and safety for the May issue of USGlass, and it got me reflecting on a “glass encounter” from my youth. I was playing at home with my brother and sister while my mom was out and our babysitter sat upstairs on the couch watching TV.

On what would be the last day this young lady would ever babysit us, my sister and I were antagonizing our little brother by playing school in our basement playroom and ignoring his repeated requests to come and play outside. We much preferred to sucker Rick into playing our games (even though he usually popped the heads off of our Barbies and ate the paper we used to play school) and, with the babysitter there, he couldn’t have one of his friends visit. So he stood angrily outside, watching us through the window and occasionally knocking on the glass just so we wouldn’t forget he was there.

Of course the more we ignored him, the harder Rick knocked on the window, until we were finally all shouting at each other through the glass and he was banging furiously. As I’m sure you can imagine, the glass was the first to break; I remember the jagged shards (obviously this was an older house we lived in) and a thunderous silence after all of our screaming. We stood staring at Rick and Rick stood staring at us, until somebody noticed the blood oozing from his wrist down the forearm that he stood grasping, and then the screaming began again. (Given our babysitter’s look when we found her upstairs, I’m sure that was the day she swore off children forever.)

Obviously we were stupid kids who had no business banging on the window. But does our foolish misuse of the product and overall lack of commonsense mean that the manufacturer should have had the forethought to protect us from the injury that occurred?

Maybe this is an extreme example, but it’s a question I’ve been considering as, every couple of weeks, we post another story on http://www.usgnn.com/ relating the latest fall through a skylight. Sometimes it’s kids who don’t know any better. Sometimes it’s roofers or other construction professionals lacking proper safety precautions. Either way, it’s an event that occurs frequently enough that ASTM is now working on a test method on the impact resistance of skylights.

According to task group E06.51.25 chairperson Nigel Ellis, president of Ellis Fall Safety Solutions, the group was convened “because the toll of occupational deaths is constant from year to year. And since the design of skylights is controllable by manufacturers it seems that all skylights should be tested with a uniform test method.”

Well, should it? Nigel told me during our discussion that the group is still looking from glass and skylight manufacturers as it examines this path. I’m also curious to hear what you think. How far can you go with designing to prevent injuries when the injuries that occur are due to a misuse of the product? Is it just a matter of reinforcing the need for proper fall protection equipment on a jobsite (or blocking the path to those commercial skylights and glass roofs that seems so tempting to teens)? Would labeling be helpful for manufacturers, reminding kids, maintenance staff, roofers, contractors and anyone else up on the roof that a lite of glass is not a seat? Or is this a problem that only the plastic skylight manufacturers should be considering?

Let us know what you think, because speaking out could mean determining the way skylights are tested and manufactured in the future.